Do You Get Intimidated by Eloquent English Speakers? You Shouldn’t!

By Robby

If you are new here please read this first.

Intimidating Eloquent English speaker

Improve Spoken English

One evening while on my way home from work I was listening to an evening chat show where some Irish-American was analyzing the aftermath of the last American presidential election and its effect on the Republican Party.

And here’s the funny thing:

Even though I understood EVERY SINGLE WORD he was saying, I couldn’t really figure out what exactly he’s trying to say!

Every sentence he uttered was very vague; it was as if he was saying EVERYTHING AND NOTHING at the same time…

After his interview, I realized that he was basically trying to convey the following: the Republican Party are still slow to embrace the fast-changing ethnic composition of the American population, and in his view it was one of the decisive factors as to why Mitt Romney lost the presidential election to Barack Obama.

It took him 5 minutes or more to explain something so simple, and I can’t think of a more fitting English idiom to describe what he was doing than the following: he was beating around the bush! 😀

He was using super-sophisticated industry lingo.

He was rephrasing a single concept many times over and he was repeating the same things all over and over again.

I was starting to feel lost while trying to make sense of the tangled mess that his speech was! 😡

Some time ago such an experience would have made me feel very bad as a foreign English speaker because I would have started doubting my own English skills:

“My English isn’t good enough because I can’t make out what he’s saying…”

“He speaks so fluently and he’s using all these means of expression so professionally… I’ll never be able to speak like him!”

Such and similar thoughts would be crossing my mind, but now I know better than start beating myself over not being able to replicate such a seemingly eloquent speech.

In fact, now I wouldn’t even want to be able to speak like that, because not only would I be confusing people who are listening to me but also myself!

I’d rather say a lot with fewer words than use a never-ending cascade of verbal content which is going to overwhelm my conversation partner or listener and make them acutely aware of their inability to match up to my train of thoughts.

How about you?

Are you often feeling inferior to some very eloquent English speaker?

Are you admiring their ability to use sophisticated language?

Is it making your English skills pale in comparison?

Then keep reading this article and you may just change your mind! 😉

Eloquence is NO Indicator of Superior Intelligence!

The purpose of this article is to show you, my foreign English speaking friends, that you should never consider yourself less intelligent just because some other native or foreign English speaker is capable of speaking just like reading from a book.

Did you know that Albert Einstein couldn’t speak fluently until he reached his ninth birthday and he was terrible at English spelling his entire life? But you would never ever dare to describe the father of the relativity theory as not being intelligent!

Of course, there are people who are very intelligent and also are able to verbalize their thoughts by forming beautiful and perfect English sentences.

Ability to describe a simple concept over 10 minutes, however, isn’t a pre-requisite for intelligence!

I remember listening to a radio interview with one the most notable British fantasy writers – Terry Pratchett. But you know what? He was anything but eloquent! He would stop quite often in a middle of a sentence to think of the right word to say, and he was also speaking using very simple vocabulary and easy-to-understand terms. Despite wielding a much larger vocabulary than your average English speaker, he spoke just like you or me if we were asked to do a radio interview!

It just goes to show, my friends, than you don’t have to judge yourself for not being able to measure up to someone’s eloquence ❗ After all, maybe it’s just the way you are; maybe it’s part of your personality to speak using somewhat plain language and not being able to elaborate extensively on a matter at hand.

Some Folks Just Aren’t Born Speakers!

If you hear someone speaking in English in a way which makes you feel bad about your own fluency, you always have to remember that not everyone is an equally good speaker even in their native language!

I can immediately think of a few fellow Latvians who just aren’t big speakers and they would speak relatively little even on social occasions.

Some people will only respond to questions using a single sentence and you’d have to constantly keep questioning them in order to gain all the information you want. But it’s only normal because that’s just the way those folks are!

So whenever you find yourself in a situation when you feel bad about your lack of skill to verbalize your thoughts by forming endless strings of perfectly arranged English words, terms and expressions, just take a moment and try to speak in the same manner in your own native language.

You may just realize that you can’t speak as perfectly as you’ve imagined, and this is a very good tool to have at your disposal whenever your English confidence needs to be restored.

I personally employ this particular method when I feel my fluency dwindle; I simply try to say in my native language whatever it is that I’m trying to say in English. And guess what? More often than not, I find that I can’t actually speak in Latvian with the imagined clarity of thought and I also have to take some time to verbalize the particular abstract concept or issue I’d been struggling to put into English words 😉

And by the way – did you not know that being reserved is actually considered a virtue by renowned writers and philosophers from the past?

Verbal Simplicity is Often Underrated

Here’s a quote I just found online (here’s the original source):

As men of sense and genius say much in few words, so on the other hand the weak and foolish speak much and say little.


We can’t, of course, use the blanket approach and tar all great speakers with the same brush, but there’s a great wisdom hidden in the above quote, don’t you think so?

Sometimes you can say just one sentence which so vividly depicts the actual situation you’re trying to describe, that nothing else doesn’t even need to be said ❗

Conversely, sometimes try as you might, you can’t get your message across to your listener or conversation partner and all those words you’re using seem to be accomplishing nothing.

I don’t deny that it is a skill to speak for minutes on end touching upon countless aspects of the same matter at hand.

As I said in the beginning of this article however, it might be very confusing for a listener and they mightn’t make sense of your story – especially if you’re stuffing it with plenty of vague terms and descriptions. Maybe there’s no need to elaborate on something that might have just as easily be described using a single sentence!

On the finishing note, I would ask you to watch this video:

This foreign English speaker has achieved a near-native level of English pronunciation and fluency, and I admire him for that. Seriously – he’s setting standards for us, other foreigners, and I would be glad to achieve 80% of his fluency at some stage in my life.

What I have a problem, however, is the speech itself.

I listened to it for a while, and I just couldn’t make much sense of it DESPITE UNDERSTANDING EVERY SINGLE WORD he’s saying!

With all due respect, I think he was trying to say something simple with way too many words, comparisons and cliché phrases, and somewhere along the way I just got lost and couldn’t follow it any more.

Please don’t get me wrong, my friends – I’m not criticizing our fellow foreigner for his perfection!

All I’m saying is that I just couldn’t follow his speech because it was TOO WELL WRITTEN; IT WAS TOO SOPHISTICATED.

Maybe I’m wrong.

Maybe you’ll listen to the entire speech and you’ll make perfect sense of it.

It’s totally possible because there are as many different opinions as there are people.

I just hope that the main message I’m trying to get across to you today is going to hammer home:

You don’t have to feel bad about your level of English by comparing yourself to speakers as eloquent as the man in the video above because sometimes eloquence is overrated and also not everyone is a born speaker!

Thanks for reading my blog,

Robby 😉

P.S. Would you like to find out why I’m highlighting some of the text in red? Read this article and you’ll learn why it’s so important to learn idiomatic expressions and how it will help you to improve your spoken English!

P.S.S. Are you serious about your spoken English improvement? Check out my English Harmony System HERE!


English Harmony System

P.S. Are you serious about your spoken English improvement? Check out the English Harmony System HERE!

English Harmony System
  • I Albinson

    I really like your blogs on language. I wish I had come across them earlier. They got me thinking about Universal Grammar – universal cognitive structures that offer the ability to develop language.
    English fluency is just as much an example of a language as it is of culture – Integration is just as important as fluency. What would French, Italian, Chinese, or Russian fluency sound like spoken by second-language-speakers with insufficient culture-insight, or local experience? Would it make sense? To what extent can it be relatable and relevant to native speakers?

  • I Albinson

    Very well put, I felt uncomfortable watching the video.

  • Well, fair enough – the speech was perfect for the audience and was well written, but please let’s not forget that this article isn’t about this particular speech, it’s all about me encouraging foreigners not to feel lesser English speakers in presence of other foreigners who are way more fluent. I just happened to come across this particular video and used it as an example of an eloquent foreign English speaker and the basic message that I wanted to send across to my audience was “OK, this guy can speak well, but it doesn’t mean you’re a totally useless English speaker. You can say all that and maybe even more using simple vocab and short sentences, so don’t let it drag you down!”

  • Please don’t misunderstand, I wasn’t trying to say that you meant to discourage people from writing or speaking well. I was saying that your wording could be misinterpreted, especially by those that are still learning to interpret English. I was pointing out the problem with the precise wording “too well-written.”

    A slight correction: I did not make the point that he needed to make it simpler. For his speech, he didn’t need to tailor it to you or other outsiders. If it was right for his audience, nothing else matters.

    And by audience, I mean those of the culture and demographic, not just those there that day. Because all of them have a cultural understanding of the topic. In fact, I’d guess that many native English speakers would have trouble understanding what he’s saying, not because of its “well-written-ness” but because he obliquely refers to elements of their culture, and fears and pride about those elements, and that OBLIQUENESS is the real problem. But he wasn’t speaking to us. He wasn’t speaking to anyone but the Chinese. And that’s a sign of a good speech.

  • “But don’t discourage people from actually trying to write or speak well” – well, with all due respect, it’s never been my intention to discourage people from trying to write and speak well! Matter of fact, that’s what my blog is all about, and furthermore – clarity of speech IS one of the cornerstones of my philosophy! What this article is all about is – helping my fellow foreigners not feel inadequate when they’re in the presence of someone who’s far superior in terms of fluency, and I just picked this particular video as an example. As for the fact that I was referring to the speaker as difficult to understand and the speech being written to well – that’s my opinion as an outside observer. Members of the audience is a different story obviously, but as someone who listens to his speech for the first time with no prior knowledge about the topic I do find it too “perfect” to take in and the words just start washing over my head. I’m sure everyone has had experiences like that – be it listening to politicians on the radio, or financial analysts discussing market trends – and my point is exactly the one you were making – why not simplify the speech and make it more user-friendly! 😉

  • The speech in the video made perfect sense. He sets the stage for the point, which he then states clearly. It’s an effective persuasive tactic. What prevents your immediate understanding is likely his cadence and inflection (which makes it harder to distinguish his point) OR the implied knowledge of the audience he’s actually speaking to. I can see definite signs of carryover from his “high context” native language, meaning that they imply much, assuming shared context. If you know how much value they place on the things under threat that he mentions, the point becomes much clearer, much earlier.

    There’s nothing wrong with tailoring your speech to your audience. In fact, it’s one of the most basic tenets of speechwriting.

    It’s the intended audience, and only the intended audience, that a speech must be clear to. That is true clarity. A well-written, sophisticated, or eloquent speech will use the eloquence to support the point, or it isn’t eloquent. But only the target audience can truly judge it.

    Ultimately, my point is this: Please don’t say that something is “too well-written.” That’s a misuse of the words. Say that something is verbose. Say it’s full of purple prose. Say it beats around the bush or that it’s sickeningly bombastic. But don’t discourage people from actually trying to write or speak well. Because clarity and simplicity are part of speaking well. So it’s better to just emphasize that clarity should be the first priority.

  • Well, I totally agree with you on that!

  • There’s an emotional disparity between his oration and voice inflection; this sort of mutuality derives from the regurgitation of a script. It’s a poor visual reference point, taking into consideration the lack of authenticity and dissonance in his cadence, intonation and voice modulation—-it’s out of sync with the content he’s conveying.
    Meaning his speech is (rehearsed)

  • Wow, never saw this one coming! English has very limited meanings of expression?

    I would actually argue that English is one of the richest languages out there considering it’s been influenced by pretty much all known Indo-European languages.

    Just because it’s not heavily inflected, doesn’t mean it’s shallow and simple.

    I’d appreciate if you could further elaborate on your comment and bring some proof to the table,



  • Noah

    English language is weak and has very limited meanings unlike semitic languages, it is very shallow and simple and has no Eloquence at all, I wonder why no one other me thought about this or mentioned ?!!!

  • artmots

    But this was the English Language, was not it? Who cares what sort of the English language you feel is yours? Like it or not, it depends…

  • Francisco Javier

    I quite agree with everything you say. There’s no point in using sophisticated language if your audience won’t understand what you are saying!

    That speaker in the video is clearly “reciting” some speech he’s learned by heart before (or maybe he is reading). I don’t think he would talk like that in his daily conversations.

  • I’ve no idea who he was, but the point is – he managed to speak in a way I found very difficult to follow!

    I’m listening to an evening radio show while driving home from work quite often, and there’s plenty of political and current affairs discussions I enjoy listening to and don’t have any problems to follow without straining my brain.

    The commentator in question didn’t jump from one thing to another or didn’t chase his train of thoughts too fast for listeners to understand; it’s just that his speech was so polished and stuffed full with industry terms and insider’s references that someone like me who’s not very familiar with the topic finds it difficult to follow.

    As for political satire – couldn’t see the video you posted – but I don’t think anyone can beat George Carlin – may he rest in peace.



  • Hi Robby

    Interesting perspective, and enjoyable to read. Am curious to know who it was.. There’s been some interesting commentary on why the Republicans lost, with some honest and frank Republicans saying some things quite clearly, and others beating around the bush, who knows, perhaps on purpose.

    If you like political satire, have a look at Jon Stewart, if you don’t already know about him. He usually pokes fun at Fox News and the Republicans, so he’s ‘liberal’ (but he can also lay into the Democrats too on occasion):

    [hope you can play it in Ireland!]

    Btw I agree with what you say above. Unfortunately sometimes Czechs will interrupt me and speak in English if I get a sentence all muddled up, but I think people in other countries will be patient and wait to hear you complete your thoughts.